Current:Home > ContactTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -ProfitEdge
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-13 14:45:38
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (86)
Related
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- The Maine lobster industry sues California aquarium over a do-not-eat listing
- Santa Barbara’s paper, one of California’s oldest, stops publishing after owner declares bankruptcy
- Honda recalls nearly 500,000 vehicles because front seat belts may not latch properly
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Indigenous Climate Activists Arrested After ‘Occupying’ US Department of Interior
- US Forest Service burn started wildfire that nearly reached Los Alamos, New Mexico, agency says
- Bank fail: How rising interest rates paved the way for Silicon Valley Bank's collapse
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Banking shares slump despite U.S. assurances that deposits are safe
Ranking
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Alix Earle and NFL Player Braxton Berrios Spotted Together at Music Festival
- Baltimore Continues Incinerating Trash, Despite Opposition from its New Mayor and City Council
- RMS Titanic Inc. holds virtual memorial for expert who died in sub implosion
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Oppenheimer 70mm film reels are 600 pounds — and reach IMAX's outer limit due to the movie's 3-hour runtime
- Wind Energy Is a Big Business in Indiana, Leading to Awkward Alliances
- Australian sailor speaks about being lost at sea with his dog for months: I didn't really think I'd make it
Recommendation
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Legal dispute facing Texan ‘Sassy Trucker’ in Dubai shows the limits of speech in UAE
You're Going to Want All of These Secrets About The Notebook Forever, Everyday
Bank fail: How rising interest rates paved the way for Silicon Valley Bank's collapse
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
China Provided Abundant Snow for the Winter Olympics, but at What Cost to the Environment?
Locals look for silver linings as Amazon hits pause on its new HQ
Save 48% on a Ninja Foodi XL 10-In-1 Air Fry Smart Oven That Does the Work of Several Appliances