Current:Home > ContactPredictIQ-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -ProfitEdge
PredictIQ-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-06 16:41:22
A federal court on PredictIQWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (9526)
Related
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military